Frank Moore Frank Moore's Profile Page

Frank Moore Frank Moore

0 Course Enrolled • 0 Course Completed

Biography

権威のあるPSE-Strata-Pro-24日本語版トレーリング一回合格-最新のPSE-Strata-Pro-24資格問題集

Palo Alto NetworksのPSE-Strata-Pro-24試験に準備するために、たくさんの本と塾なしで、我々Japancertのソフトを使用すればリラクスで目標を達成できます。弊社の商品はあなたの圧力を減少できます。それだけでなく、お金を無駄にする心配なあなたに保障を提供いたします。あなたは弊社の商品を利用して、一回でPalo Alto NetworksのPSE-Strata-Pro-24試験に合格できなかったら、弊社は全額で返金することを承諾いたします。

すべてのPalo Alto Networks受験者の試験を容易にするために、JapancertのPSE-Strata-Pro-24試験準備では履歴をテストし、パフォーマンスを確認することができます。その後、障害を見つけて克服できます。また、このタイプのPalo Alto Networks Systems Engineer Professional - Hardware Firewall試験問題を一度オンラインで使用すると、次回はオフライン環境で練習できます。 PSE-Strata-Pro-24テストトレントは、コンピューターや携帯電話の複数のクライアントがオンラインで勉強したり、オフラインで統合するためにデータを印刷したりするために使用できます。また、試験のためにPSE-Strata-Pro-24試験問題を選択することをお勧めします。

>> PSE-Strata-Pro-24日本語版トレーリング <<

更新するPSE-Strata-Pro-24日本語版トレーリング一回合格-高品質なPSE-Strata-Pro-24資格問題集

Japancertは、効果的な勤勉さを最高の報酬に変えることができる素晴らしい学習プラットフォームです。 Palo Alto Networks長年の勤勉な作業により、当社の専門家は頻繁にテストされた知識を参考のためにPSE-Strata-Pro-24試験資料に集めました。したがって、私たちの練習教材は彼らの努力の勝利です。 PSE-Strata-Pro-24試験の資料に頼ることで、以前に想像した以上の成果を確実に得ることができます。 PSE-Strata-Pro-24練習教材を選択したお客様から収集した明確なデータがあり、Palo Alto Networks Systems Engineer Professional - Hardware Firewall合格率は98〜100％です。

Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata-Pro-24 認定試験の出題範囲：

トピック
出題範囲

トピック 1

ビジネス価値と競争上の差別化要因: この試験セクションでは、テクニカルビジネス価値アナリストのスキルを測定し、Palo Alto Networks 次世代ファイアウォール (NGFW) の価値提案の特定に重点を置きます。受験者は、Panorama や SCM などのツールの技術的なビジネス上の利点を評価します。また、顧客に関連するトピックを認識し、それを Palo Alto Networks の最適なソリューションに合わせます。さらに、Strata 独自の差別化要因を理解することは、このドメインの重要な要素です。

トピック 2

導入と評価: この試験セクションでは、導入エンジニアのスキルを測定し、Palo Alto Networks NGFW の機能の特定に重点が置かれます。受験者は、既知と未知の両方の脅威から保護する機能を評価します。また、導入の観点から ID 管理を説明し、NGFW ソリューションの有効性の評価を含む価値証明 (PoV) プロセスについても説明します。

トピック 3

ネットワークセキュリティ戦略とベストプラクティス: この試験セクションでは、セキュリティ戦略スペシャリストのスキルを測定し、Palo Alto Networks の 5 段階のゼロトラスト手法の重要性を強調します。受験者は、堅牢なネットワークセキュリティを確保するためのベストプラクティスを重視しながら、ゼロトラストモデルに効果的にアプローチして適用する方法を理解する必要があります。

トピック 4

アーキテクチャと計画: この試験セクションでは、ネットワークアーキテクトのスキルを測定し、顧客の要件を理解し、適切な導入アーキテクチャを設計することに重点が置かれます。受験者は、Palo Alto Networks のプラットフォームネットワーキング機能を詳細に説明し、さまざまな環境への適合性を評価する必要があります。システムのサイズ設定や微調整などの側面の処理も、この分野で評価される重要なスキルです。

Palo Alto Networks Systems Engineer Professional - Hardware Firewall 認定 PSE-Strata-Pro-24 試験問題 (Q48-Q53):

質問 # 48
A prospective customer is interested in Palo Alto Networks NGFWs and wants to evaluate the ability to segregate its internal network into unique BGP environments.
Which statement describes the ability of NGFWs to address this need?

A. It can be addressed with BGP confederations.
B. It cannot be addressed because BGP must be fully meshed internally to work.
C. It can be addressed by creating multiple eBGP autonomous systems.
D. It cannot be addressed because PAN-OS does not support it.

正解：A

解説：
Step 1: Understand the Requirement and Context
* Customer Need: Segregate the internal network into unique BGP environments, suggesting multiple isolated or semi-isolated routing domains within a single organization.
* BGP Basics:
* BGP is a routing protocol used to exchange routing information between autonomous systems (ASes).
* eBGP: External BGP, used between different ASes.
* iBGP: Internal BGP, used within a single AS, typically requiring a full mesh of peers unless mitigated by techniques like confederations or route reflectors.
* Palo Alto NGFW: Supports BGP on virtual routers (VRs) within PAN-OS, enabling advanced routing capabilities for Strata hardware firewalls (e.g., PA-Series).
* References: "PAN-OS supports BGP for dynamic routing and network segmentation" (docs.
paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/10-2/pan-os-networking-admin/bgp).
Step 2: Evaluate Each Option
Option A: It cannot be addressed because PAN-OS does not support it
* Analysis:
* PAN-OS fully supports BGP, including eBGP, iBGP, confederations, and route reflectors, configurable under "Network > Virtual Routers > BGP."
* Features like multiple virtual routers and BGP allow network segregation and routing policy control.
* This statement contradicts documented capabilities.
* Verification:
* "Configure BGP on a virtual router for dynamic routing" (docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/10-2
/pan-os-networking-admin/bgp/configure-bgp).
* Conclusion: Incorrect-PAN-OS supports BGP and segregation techniques.Not Applicable.
Option B: It can be addressed by creating multiple eBGP autonomous systems
* Analysis:
* eBGP: Used between distinct ASes, each with a unique AS number (e.g., AS 65001, AS 65002).
* Within a single organization, creating multiple eBGP ASes would require:
* Assigning unique AS numbers (public or private) to each internal segment.
* Treating each segment as a separate AS, peering externally with other segments via eBGP.
* Challenges:
* Internally, this isn't practical for a single network-it's more suited to external peering (e.
g., with ISPs).
* Requires complex management and public/private AS number allocation, not ideal for internal segregation.
* Doesn't leverage iBGP or confederations, which are designed for internal AS management.
* PAN-OS supports eBGP, but this approach misaligns with the intent of internal network segregation.
* Verification:
* "eBGP peers connect different ASes" (docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/10-2/pan-os- networking-admin/bgp/bgp-concepts).
* Conclusion: Possible but impractical and not the intended BGP solution for internal segregation.Not Optimal.
Option C: It can be addressed with BGP confederations
* Description: BGP confederations divide a single AS into sub-ASes (each with a private Confederation Member AS number), reducing the iBGP full-mesh requirement while maintaining a unified external AS.
* Analysis:
* How It Works:
* Single AS (e.g., AS 65000) is split into sub-ASes (e.g., 65001, 65002).
* Within each sub-AS, iBGP full mesh or route reflectors are used.
* Between sub-ASes, eBGP-like peering (confederation EBGP) connects them, but externally, it appears as one AS.
* Segregation:
* Each sub-AS can represent a unique BGP environment (e.g., department, site) with its own routing policies.
* Firewalls within a sub-AS peer via iBGP; across sub-ASes, they use confederation EBGP.
* PAN-OS Support:
* Configurable under "Network > Virtual Routers > BGP > Confederation" with a Confederation Member AS number.
* Ideal for large internal networks needing segmentation without multiple public AS numbers.
* Benefits:
* Simplifies internal BGP management.
* Aligns with the customer's need for unique internal BGP environments.
* Verification:
* "BGP confederations reduce full-mesh burden by dividing an AS into sub-ASes" (docs.
paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/10-2/pan-os-networking-admin/bgp/bgp-confederations).
* "Supports unique internal routing domains" (knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com).
* Conclusion: Directly addresses the requirement with a supported, practical solution.Applicable.
Option D: It cannot be addressed because BGP must be fully meshed internally to work
* Analysis:
* iBGP Full Mesh: Traditional iBGP requires all routers in an AS to peer with each other, scaling poorly (n(n-1)/2 connections).
* Mitigation: PAN-OS supports alternatives:
* Route Reflectors: Centralize iBGP peering.
* Confederations: Divide the AS into sub-ASes (see Option C).
* This statement ignores these features, falsely claiming BGP's limitation prevents segregation.
* Verification:
* "Confederations and route reflectors eliminate full-mesh needs" (docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan- os/10-2/pan-os-networking-admin/bgp/bgp-confederations).
* Conclusion: Incorrect-PAN-OS overcomes full-mesh constraints.Not Applicable.
Step 3: Recommendation Justification
* Why Option C?
* Alignment: Confederations allow the internal network to be segregated into unique BGP environments (sub-ASes) while maintaining a single external AS, perfectly matching the customer's need.
* Scalability: Reduces iBGP full-mesh complexity, ideal for large or segmented internal networks.
* PAN-OS Support: Explicitly implemented in BGP configuration, validated by documentation.
* Why Not Others?
* A: False-PAN-OS supports BGP and segregation.
* B: eBGP is for external ASes, not internal segregation; less practical thanconfederations.
* D: Misrepresents BGP capabilities; full mesh isn't required with confederations or route reflectors.
Step 4: Verified References
* BGP Confederations: "Divide an AS into sub-ASes for internal segmentation" (docs.paloaltonetworks.
com/pan-os/10-2/pan-os-networking-admin/bgp/bgp-confederations).
* PAN-OS BGP: "Supports eBGP, iBGP, and confederations for routing flexibility" (paloaltonetworks.
com, PAN-OS Networking Guide).
* Use Case: "Confederations suit large internal networks" (knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com).

質問 # 49
Which two actions should a systems engineer take when a customer is concerned about how to remain aligned to Zero Trust principles as they adopt additional security features over time? (Choose two)

A. Turn on all licensed Cloud-Delivered Security Services (CDSS) subscriptions in blocking mode for all policies.
B. Use the Best Practice Assessment (BPA) tool to measure progress toward Zero Trust principles.
C. Use the Policy Optimizer tool to understand security rules allowing users to bypass decryption.
D. Apply decryption where possible to inspect and log all new and existing traffic flows.

正解：B、D

解説：
When adopting additional security features over time, remaining aligned with Zero Trust principles requires a focus on constant visibility, control, and adherence to best practices. The following actions are the most relevant:
* Why "Apply decryption where possible to inspect and log all new and existing traffic flows" (Correct Answer B)?Zero Trust principles emphasize visibility into all traffic, whether encrypted or unencrypted. Without decryption, encrypted traffic becomes a blind spot, which attackers can exploit.
By applying decryption wherever feasible, organizations ensure they can inspect, log, and enforce policies on encrypted traffic, thus adhering to Zero Trust principles.
* Why "Use the Best Practice Assessment (BPA) tool to measure progress toward Zero Trust principles" (Correct Answer C)?The BPA tool provides detailed insights into the customer's security configuration, helping measure alignment with Palo Alto Networks' Zero Trust best practices. It identifies gaps in security posture and recommends actionable steps to strengthen adherence to Zero Trust principles over time.
* Why not "Turn on all licensed Cloud-Delivered Security Services (CDSS) subscriptions in blocking mode for all policies" (Option A)?While enabling CDSS subscriptions (like Threat Prevention, URL Filtering, Advanced Threat Prevention) in blocking mode can enhance security, it is not an action specifically tied to maintaining alignment with Zero Trust principles. A more holistic approach, such as decryption and BPA analysis, is critical to achieving Zero Trust.
* Why not "Use the Policy Optimizer tool to understand security rules allowing users to bypass decryption" (Option D)?Policy Optimizer is used to optimize existing security rules by identifying unused or overly permissive policies. While useful, it does not directly address alignment with Zero Trust principles or help enforce decryption.

質問 # 50
Which two methods are valid ways to populate user-to-IP mappings? (Choose two.)

A. User-ID
B. XML API
C. Captive portal
D. SCP log ingestion

正解：B、C

解説：
Step 1: Understanding User-to-IP Mappings
User-to-IP mappings are the foundation of User-ID, a core feature of Strata Hardware Firewalls (e.g., PA-400 Series, PA-5400 Series). These mappings link a user's identity (e.g., username) to their device's IP address, enabling policy enforcement based on user identity rather than just IP. Palo Alto Networks supports multiple methods to populate these mappings, depending on thenetwork environment and authentication mechanisms.
* Purpose:Allows the firewall to apply user-based policies, monitor user activity, and generate user- specific logs.
* Strata Context:On a PA-5445, User-ID integrates with App-ID and security subscriptions to enforce granular access control.

質問 # 51
Which two files are used to deploy CN-Series firewalls in Kubernetes clusters? (Choose two.)

A. PAN-CN-MGMT
B. PAN-CNI-MULTUS
C. PAN-CN-MGMT-CONFIGMAP
D. PAN-CN-NGFW-CONFIG

正解：C、D

解説：
CN-Series firewalls are Palo Alto Networks' containerized NGFWs designed for protecting Kubernetes environments. These firewalls provide threat prevention, traffic inspection, and compliance enforcement within containerized workloads. Deploying CN-Series in a Kubernetescluster requires specific configuration files to set up the management plane and NGFW functionalities.
* Option A (Correct):PAN-CN-NGFW-CONFIGis required to define the configurations for the NGFW itself. This file contains firewall policies, application configurations, and security profiles needed to secure the Kubernetes environment.
* Option B (Correct):PAN-CN-MGMT-CONFIGMAPis a ConfigMap file that contains the configuration for the management plane of the CN-Series firewall. It helps set up the connection between the management interface and the NGFW deployed within the Kubernetes cluster.
* Option C:This option does not represent a valid or required file for deploying CN-Series firewalls. The management configurations are handled via the ConfigMap.
* Option D:PAN-CNI-MULTUSrefers to the Multus CNI plugin for Kubernetes, which is used for enabling multiple network interfaces in pods. While relevant for Kubernetes networking, it is not specific to deploying CN-Series firewalls.
References:
* CN-Series Deployment Guide: https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/cn-series
* Kubernetes Integration with CN-Series Firewalls:https://www.paloaltonetworks.com

質問 # 52
The efforts of a systems engineer (SE) with an industrial mining company account have yielded interest in Palo Alto Networks as part of its effort to incorporate innovative design into operations using robots and remote-controlled vehicles in dangerous situations. A discovery call confirms that the company will receive control signals to its machines over a private mobile network using radio towers that connect to cloud-based applications that run the control programs.
Which two sets of solutions should the SE recommend?

A. That Cloud NGFW be included to protect the cloud-based applications from external access into the cloud service provider hosting them.
B. That 5G Security be enabled and architected to ensure the cloud computing is not compromised in the commands it is sending to the onsite machines.
C. That an Advanced CDSS bundle (Advanced Threat Prevention, Advanced WildFire, and Advanced URL Filtering) be procured to ensure the design receives advanced protection.
D. That IoT Security be included for visibility into the machines and to ensure that other devices connected to the network are identified and given risk and behavior profiles.

正解：B、D

解説：
* 5G Security (Answer A):
* In this scenario, the mining company operates on a private mobile network, likely powered by5G technologyto ensure low latency and high bandwidth for controlling robots and vehicles.
* Palo Alto Networks5G Securityis specifically designed to protect private mobile networks. It prevents exploitation of vulnerabilities in the 5G infrastructure and ensures the control signals sent to the machines arenot compromisedby attackers.
* Key features include network slicing protection, signaling plane security, and secure user plane communications.
* IoT Security (Answer C):
* The mining operation depends on machines and remote-controlled vehicles, which are IoT devices.
* Palo Alto NetworksIoT Securityprovides:
* Full device visibilityto detect all IoT devices (such as robots, remote vehicles, or sensors).
* Behavioral analysisto create risk profiles and identify anomalies in the machines' operations.
* This ensures a secure environment for IoT devices, reducing the risk of a device being exploited.
* Why Not Cloud NGFW (Answer B):
* WhileCloud NGFWis critical for protecting cloud-based applications, the specific concern here is protecting control signals and IoT devicesrather than external access into the cloud service.
* The private mobile network and IoT device protection requirements make5G SecurityandIoT Securitymore relevant.
* Why Not Advanced CDSS Bundle (Answer D):
* The Advanced CDSS bundle (Advanced Threat Prevention, Advanced WildFire, Advanced URL Filtering) is essential for securing web traffic and detecting threats, but it does not address the specific challenges of securing private mobile networksandIoT devices.
* While these services can supplement the design, they are not theprimary focusin this use case.
References from Palo Alto Networks Documentation:
* 5G Security for Private Mobile Networks
* IoT Security Solution Brief
* Cloud NGFW Overview

質問 # 53
......

あなたは短い時間でPSE-Strata-Pro-24試験に合格できるために、我々は多くの時間と労力を投資してあなたにPalo Alto NetworksのPSE-Strata-Pro-24試験を開発しますから、我々の提供する商品はIT認定試験という分野で大好評を得ています。だからこそ、我々はJapancertの問題集に自信があります。自信があるから、我々は失敗返金ということを承諾します。

PSE-Strata-Pro-24資格問題集: https://www.japancert.com/PSE-Strata-Pro-24.html

Frank Moore Frank Moore

Biography

Quick Links

Resources

Support